Different systems
to make decisions
The following table shows different methods to make decisions. Each
one can be appropriate in different cases. Even the autocratic model
- where the decision is made by a single person - can be very useful
in extreme situations of crisis. Every group should consider what
the best option is for its particular case, according to its level
of maturity and training. In many cases, groups use a combination
of systems.
|
+ |
— |
Autocratic
One person decides |
Very Fast
Good in crisis |
Less likely
to be the wisest decision |
Consultative
Autocratic with advice from others |
Fast
More ideas and information |
Takes more
time
Less chance of acceptance and commitment by others |
Minority
Experts, or those with vested interest |
Faster than
whole group
Decision by “experts” |
All points
of view not necessarily heard
Not necessarily representative |
Majority
Voting |
Can be used
with any size group
Most people know this procedure |
Win/lose
mentality
Lack of commitment by losers
Issues become personalized |
Consensus
Loyal minority agree to support majority |
All opinions
aired
Promotes synthesis of ideas
Elicits more commitment |
Takes more
time
Requires mature members
Progress can be blocked by one person
Best in small groups... difficult in large groups
Can end up operating on lowest common denominator |
Unanimity
Everyone totally agrees |
Most comfortable |
Almost impossible
to achieve with more than 2 people |
|
